I'm 6'1", 230lbs, and have also been struggling a bit finding gear light + comfortable + cheap (you really only get to pick two of the three)...
I have an Osprey Atmos 65 AG pack. right about 4lb, but the suspension (for me) makes up for it. after 28 years in the military, carrying military rucks - this thing is a dream. Gram weenies scream at me for having such a heavy ruck - but I really like the features of the back air channel, the adjustability to my size, and it's the most comfortable pack I've put on to date. I did also try an Osprey Aether, there was no comparison for me, this was 4lb well-spent. Oh and I don't use the lid - it has a nice flap that works as a rain-lid when you choose to not carry the lid.
I also have a WBBB-XLC, DL. with woopie sling and tree hugger suspension, that bag comes to 34oz (so just over 2lb). Again, I'm balancing the three choices, with a bias toward comfort. I admitted to myself that I would never be a 10lb ultralight guy - but I can easily hit 25lb packs. At my size, I don't really notice a 25lb pack. For me - the WBBB-XLC is way more comfort than my dutch 11' argon hammock, or the ENO doublenest i used to use. the dutch hammock is great, don't get me wrong - and the price can't be beat - but for comfort, a WBBB with the integrated bug-net, and the foot box, and the shelf, and just the overall comfort of that hammock - well, it's like comparing a luxurious recliner to an office chair. It is an expensive choice to make, but weight-wise it's not so bad. I went DL because I slide a pad inbetween the layers (which is awesome) but I just ordered a UQ. Still - 34oz for a double-layer hammock that's as comfortable as the WBBB-XLC - for me, 2lb is worth it.
so with those two items I get to 6lb, when if I went with lighter options (and less comfortable) I would be at 3lb. Is the 3lb difference worth it? In my opinion, absolutely. You can't beat a good night's sleep, and you carry the ruck almost the entire time you're awake - those two pieces of gear have got to be the most comfortable (and capable) in your entire kit.
FWIW - my entire load-out for a "AT thru-hike" (which I haven't done yet, although I've done multiple gear shake downs and 3-5 day sections) is about 21lb without consumables (food, water, fuel - no hidden hanky-panky). If I add in 9lb for 4 days of food/water/fuel (a bit high of an estimate) I'm still only at 30lb. That's carrying a WB SuperFly tarp(23oz with rigging), a 12oz hygiene kit, and 5lb of sleeping bag / pad. A bit heavier than many, but it allows me to sleep in peace and comfort in 35-40 degrees, with the torrential rains pouring down. AND it gives me a nice, comfortable pack to put my stuff in that feels like it conforms to my body.
anyway, thought I'd share my personal experiences since we're pretty similar size-wise. I would recommend against getting caught up in the "lighter is always better" syndrome (I know, that's blasphemy over on WhiteBlaze) and instead say to go by REI or someplace, and try on some packs. You may be amazed at what a 3-4lb pack feels like, especially with some weight in it, compared to a 1-2lb pack that has thinner straps, etc. And don't write off comfortable hammocks just because of weight - it's an option, but really it takes a self-eval of what kind of hiker are you. For me - 21lb is pretty nice for all of the comfort I get to have - I can occasionally "camp" when I want to instead of just always "hiking".
good luck!
Bookmarks