cinch buckles

**Nest** · 10-17-2007, 17:21

Originally Posted by Cannibal

Glad you brought this up slowhike. I've been thinking about the topic a lot lately since I'm going to be hanging for about 200 days in a row. I totally agree that you should have plenty of warning time if it does begin to become a problem, but I really don't want to deal with it if it can be avoided. I've already decided to take the rings with me on my thru for all the reasons you listed.

But, I really do like the cinch buckles and will probably use those on any other hikes or outings.

This will be a good test then. I will be using the cinch buckles on my thru. Everyone take bets on who will fall first!

I have seen how the straps rest on a hard edge, but I don't see it as a problem with ym straps. I am using the heavier 1" polyester straps rated at something like 3400 lbs. If you use lighter straps that have a much lower rating, then I would be concerned. Mine are pretty thick though, so I think they should hold up for a thru.

**Cannibal** · 10-17-2007, 17:28

I'm carrying those big, heavy, keep my butt off the ground, Strapworks 1"ers.

And it's a bet!

**angrysparrow** · 10-17-2007, 17:51

Originally Posted by Cerberus

I am using the heavier 1" polyester straps...

Originally Posted by Cannibal

I'm carrying those big, heavy, keep my butt off the ground, Strapworks 1"ers.

It's a bit amusing to hear two people who are planning thru hikes talk about choosing the heavy option when there is a choice of equipment...

I don't disagree with your choice, but it is certainly atypical of the gram-counting nature of most of the thru-hiking packing plans.

Good luck to both of you.

**Nest** · 10-17-2007, 17:54

Originally Posted by Cannibal

I'm carrying those big, heavy, keep my butt off the ground, Strapworks 1"ers.

And it's a bet!

Yeah, that's what I'm using. Couldn't remember the company's name. Good, we have pretty decent experiment. Of course our weight differences will effect the outcome, but this should give a good idea.

So, when you say it's a bet, does that mean you are making a bet that is opposite of mine? Because I bet that if one of ours fails it will be mine, so you may lose.

Is it wrong to bet against myself?

**Nest** · 10-17-2007, 17:58

Originally Posted by angrysparrow

It's a bit amusing to hear two people who are planning thru hikes talk about choosing the heavy option when there is a choice of equipment...

I don't disagree with your choice, but it is certainly atypical of the gram-counting nature of most of the thru-hiking packing plans.

Good luck to both of you.

I have a different idea on weight. I go lightweight in some areas so I can go heavy in others. I use a KMart grease pot, 1.5 oz. homemade alky stove, trail runners, MacCat Deluxe tarp, and various other lightweight gear items. In return I carry heavier straps and buckles, more food and water, and a good warm sleep system. My goal isn't to go as light as possible, but to be comfortable under 35 lbs.

**warbonnetguy** · 10-17-2007, 18:16

Originally Posted by Cannibal

I'm carrying those big, heavy, keep my butt off the ground, Strapworks 1"

man, you crazy. the owf webbing is way lighter, and the last 2 devices on the fig 9 thread allow the exact same adjustment capabilities as rings, and i don't think rapt or schrochem were using a backup half hitch either. by switching to a line permanently tied to a owf tree strap w/biner on end, and some "line rings", you could save many oz. even with the 2 biners.

here's the link: http://www.hammockforums.net/forum/s...t=1706&page=38

**Cannibal** · 10-17-2007, 18:20

Originally Posted by warbonnetguy

here's the link: comming soon

That just ain't right!

**FanaticFringer** · 10-17-2007, 18:21

Originally Posted by warbonnetguy

man, you crazy. the owf webbing is way lighter, and the last 2 devices on the fig 9 thread allow the exact same adjustment capabilities as rings, and i don't think rapt or schrochem were using a backup half hitch either. by switching to a line permanently tied to a owf tree strap w/biner on end, and some "line rings", you could save many oz. even with the 2 biners.

here's the link: comming soon

I definetely agree using the OWF camo webbing. Great stuff. Weighs the same as Speer 1" polypro. and has 2000lb. strength.

**Cannibal** · 10-17-2007, 18:28

Cerberus- first one to fall owes the other beer, pizza, ice cream, or whatever the vice of the week is at the time. Trouble is, I doubt very much either of us would let it get to the point of failure. We'll have to rely on the honor system.

I'm with Cerberus on this one angrysparrow; I'm picking my battles. I've opted for a 1/2 length UQ to drop a few ounces. I'm carrying a ULA pack because it is a happy middle ground weight wise and waaaaaay comfy. But, my butt is not hitting the ground if I can help it!

Oh, and you can pry my SnowPeak from my cold dead hands!