Demostix raised an interesting point about excessive suspension in the tech line suspension thread and I wanted to bring up another point here without taking that tread too far off-topic.
His point was "consider the lengths of whoopie sling tails trailing to the ground over the last years of camping? How often have both tails NOT touched the ground? Would you have been more than inconvenienced if at least one sling were half the length, and the eye-loop-terminated cord you carry, for emergency, been called on as an extender for that rare long span between trees?"
Good points indeed, and I'd like to add to that: how often do you have extra webbing on your tree straps?
We have some pretty big trees where I hang and I carry 6' straps, which would allow me to hang from trees with a 23" diameter or double wrap smaller trees when possible. But in a pinch, I could wrap my straps 2/3rds around the tree and use my whoopie for the side facing the hammock which would let me hang from two 34" diameter trees. Assuming the damaging forces are on the backside of the tree, this would still allow for adequate protection. Now a 34" diameter tree is pretty big. Finding two of those growing within 14' of each other with no other suitable trees nearby are pretty darn slim.
Going on the principle that any really big tree is likely to be surrounded by smaller trees, wouldn't it make more sense to carry a long tree strap and a shorter tree strap? What are your thoughts and experiences regarding tree sizing and spacing? Are we all carrying too much extra suspension? Or is this really just a question for those few ultralighters looking to shave off those last few grams and not something of concern for everyone else?
Bookmarks