Watched the movie Avatar again last night and noticed that the hammocks were bridged on the head end and gathered at the foot. Wondering if this has ever been done on a real hammock? Would there be any advantage to this setup?
Watched the movie Avatar again last night and noticed that the hammocks were bridged on the head end and gathered at the foot. Wondering if this has ever been done on a real hammock? Would there be any advantage to this setup?
Most of us end up poorer here but richer for being here. Olddog, Fulltime hammocker, 365 nights a year.
I guess the Na'vi don't like shoulder squeeze.<-- blue emoticon - get it?
HangCon Sign Up:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
So many trees, so little time...
love that movie!!!
Would the Knotty mod help stop their tails from falling out?
+1 olddog!Originally Posted by olddog
Hmmm... wonder what the folks over at the "mini-spreader bar" thread would make of this... http://www.hammockforums.net/forum/s...=mini+spreader
- Loki my videos
"Climb the mountains and get their good tidings.
Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees.
The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy,
while cares will drop away from you like the leaves of Autumn." — John Muir
If your head was at a bridge end your feet would be raised, right? Seems like the other direction would be more logical. Eliminates the need for a pillow. I've allways seen a bridge hammock as like sleeping in a coffin, on your back. Intuitively it seems constrictive. What if the head end was bridged, and the foot end was dropped like a foot box? ----______/----
God let me be the man that my dog thinks I am
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
H.Y.O.H.
Bookmarks