Webbing questions for ring buckles

Printable View

12-28-2007, 14:58
Patrick

Webbing questions for ring buckles

Sorry if this has been done to death. I've been looking, but can't seem to find a definitive answer.

I just set my hammock up with ring buckles last night. I ordered both polypro and polyester webbing from Strapworks, but couldn't wait for it to arrive, so bought some 1" tie-down straps from REI last night to play with. They're polypro and seem identical to my Speer webbing, which is rated at something like 700 pounds.

After playing around with the hammock in the house, the straps were slightly marked where the rings locked in. They looked a little shiny there. I know I'll be setting up at different places in the strap each night in the woods, but I'd feel better with something that's going to last ages.

The 1" polyester webbing on Strapworks is listed at 3,500 pounds. If it's what I'm thinking of, the surface is a little slicker, right? Does that slicker surface work as well with ring buckles? Last night I was using a bight in the end and had no problems at all.

How about the weight? I'm looking at probably two 12' lengths. A bit of extra weight for the extra durability is fine, but I don't want to go bananas.

Any other ring buckle tips out there or things to consider with polypro vs. polyester? I know I have to be sure to keep things in line. I think I heard something about dropping a hitch or something in behind them when tying. Am I remembering that right?

Thanks for the help. So far, I'm liking the buckle system.
12-28-2007, 15:32
Nest

I used the 3500 lbs. polyester with rings, and didn't get any marks on the webbing. The problem is two 12' lengths of that stuff weighs 13 oz.
12-28-2007, 15:57
Patrick

Yikes, really? I was just reading another thread where someone mentioned the OWF webbing. I'd always thought that was polypro, but I see it's polyester. A lot of people seem to use that. Is it more comparable with Speer-type webbing in terms of weight? How about rating?
12-28-2007, 15:58
Patrick

Cerberus, did the rings hold the webbing well?
12-28-2007, 16:46
FanaticFringer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick

Yikes, really? I was just reading another thread where someone mentioned the OWF webbing. I'd always thought that was polypro, but I see it's polyester. A lot of people seem to use that. Is it more comparable with Speer-type webbing in terms of weight? How about rating?

The OWF woodland green camo webbing 1" is basically identical to the Speer 1" in terms of weight. It is rated to 2000lbs. Really nice webbing.
I know I beat this drum a lot here but I'd suggest picking up a pair of cinch buckles and see if you dont like them better than the rings. Many here have made the switch. http://www.onrope1.com/store/index.p...d=118&parent=4
12-28-2007, 16:53
Patrick

Sold, I'll pick some up, thank you.

I tried to order the cinch buckles yesterday, but something was up with the site and I couldn't get to the cart. So, I cruised HF while I waited...

One of the reasons I wound up going with the rings (other than I already had some) was that Jeff switched from buckles to rings and seemed to like them better. Jeff's one of the few internet guys I trust :)

The rings appeal to me on some level, probably because they're so simple and universal. But my mind's not made up by any means. What do you like better about the buckles?
12-28-2007, 17:10
FanaticFringer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick

Sold, I'll pick some up, thank you.

I tried to order the cinch buckles yesterday, but something was up with the site and I couldn't get to the cart. So, I cruised HF while I waited...

One of the reasons I wound up going with the rings (other than I already had some) was that Jeff switched from buckles to rings and seemed to like them better. Jeff's one of the few internet guys I trust :)

The rings appeal to me on some level, probably because they're so simple and universal. But my mind's not made up by any means. What do you like better about the buckles?

I used the rings for awhile and really liked them. AngrySparrow sent me a pair of cinch buckles to see if I liked them better and I did. Your not relying on a safety hitch to keep your butt off the ground like with the rings. The rings have the potential to come uneven and drop you also. Some have a little problem getting the cinch buckles loose if you tie the hammock real tight like most do in a Hennessy, but it is no big deal. A main reason Just Jeff switched to the rings was that when he was using the Crazy Creek buckles (no longer available) he had two extra small pieces of webbing to keep track of. He later did away with these extra pieces. I think he's now going to the garda hitch method. Could be wrong.
12-28-2007, 17:51
Nest

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick

Cerberus, did the rings hold the webbing well?

Still had to use the slipknot. I think that's standard with the rings no matter what webbing you use.
12-28-2007, 19:05
slowhike

yep, i use a slip knot against the rings. it has no chance of slipping w/ that in place, & one jerk unties the slip knot.

i used the cinch buckles for a while (nightly in my bed room) & my concern was that they put all the force in a small, sharp bend.
the webbing in the bend became extremely soft & a little fuzzy.

grant it, i was using a cheap 1" webbing from wal-mart, but it made me think about long term. if a person was using a highly rated webbing, that may not be a legitimate concern, but that's just the impression i was left with.

on the other hand, using the ring buckles, the webbing goes around a some what larger, rounded surface.

right now i'm using the speer webbing but i may try some of the OWF pollyester that's about the same weight but rated stronger.
12-28-2007, 19:29
Patrick

The slip knot is putting a bight through instead of just the single end or do you mean a separate knot tied in the webbing?
12-28-2007, 19:58
slowhike

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick

The slip knot is putting a bight through instead of just the single end or do you mean a separate knot tied in the webbing?

i tried up loading a picture, but it wouldn't up load.
i'll get back to you on that.
12-28-2007, 20:05
Just Jeff

Yes - that's a slip knot. So you can pull the end and the whole knot comes undone.
12-28-2007, 20:16
Patrick

Okay, cool. I like that because of the easy take-down and adjustment. I was hoping you guys meant that and not tying some other knot behind the rings.
12-28-2007, 20:24
slowhike

i remember reading something about the garda hitch method that FF mentioned, but when i did a search, it didn't turn up any thing.
does someone remember where that is explained?
12-28-2007, 20:28
angrysparrow

Quote:

Originally Posted by slowhike

i remember reading something about the garda hitch method that FF mentioned, but when i did a search, it didn't turn up any thing.
does someone remember where that is explained?

Did you mean this?
12-28-2007, 20:35
slowhike

Quote:

Originally Posted by angrysparrow

Did you mean this?

yep, that's it. thanks. i don't know why it didn't show for me. i may have forgot to use "spell check":o
12-28-2007, 20:58
angrysparrow

Quote:

Originally Posted by slowhike

yep, that's it. thanks. i don't know why it didn't show for me. i may have forgot to use "spell check":o

No worries. I must admit that I've long since abandoned using the search feature built into the forum itself. I generally get better results using Google in the following way:

Google:

whatever_i'm_looking_for site:hammockforums.net
12-28-2007, 21:02
slowhike

Quote:

Originally Posted by angrysparrow

No worries. I must admit that I've long since abandoned using the search feature built into the forum itself. I generally get better results using Google in the following way:

Google:

whatever_i'm_looking_for site:hammockforums.net

ahhh... i'll have to try that.
12-31-2007, 21:44
slowhike

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick

The slip knot is putting a bight through instead of just the single end or do you mean a separate knot tied in the webbing?

here's a picture of the slip knot against the ring buckles.
http://www.hammockforums.net/gallery...5/PC280107.JPG
12-31-2007, 23:16
tight-wad

I'm using rings and (I think) nylon. (The webbing was a part of a 4 wheeler ATV tie down with cambers that I got at an auto parts store for 10 bucks. Used a drimmel tool to cut off the heavy hook from the box and scissors to cut off the cambers. It was rated for 2100 pounds, 1", camo, 2 15 ft pieces.)

The slip knot behind the rings is no big deal. Simple. Just tighten the strap as desired, flip your hands twice, and you have it. Locks it in, simple tug in the morning, and its undone.

Works good, lightweight, simple. What else do you need?
01-01-2008, 03:05
Patrick

So, you're tying the slip knot around the webbing coming out of the rings. I'm doing it in between the rings. So, instead of passing the free end through the rings and out, I'm passing a bight through them.
01-01-2008, 09:45
Just Jeff

I bet that's even faster to adjust.
01-01-2008, 10:31
slowhike

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patrick

So, you're tying the slip knot around the webbing coming out of the rings. I'm doing it in between the rings. So, instead of passing the free end through the rings and out, I'm passing a bight through them.

got a picture?