Regaurdless of my own opinions on the matter, I think tom h is doing the best thing he can do in this by not posting anything. It was good of him to submit a email, but I can't see a good outcome...
Type: Posts; User: Coffee
Regaurdless of my own opinions on the matter, I think tom h is doing the best thing he can do in this by not posting anything. It was good of him to submit a email, but I can't see a good outcome...
I see what you guys are saying.
Maybe we should all agree not to add anything to the discussion unless we are furthering it with new information.
Look to the fashionable belts of the 80's.:cool:
I've set through a couple long and boring lectures on intellectial property rights concerning anything that I would develop while in college.
I wonder if the same concept holds true with something...
The Jacks said that a really old Aussie hammock was the imperation for their design.
I'm not a lawyer or he was going after me, but I am starting to get the impression that if what is said here is true, I would consider turning it back towards him.
This might beg the question on how public his patient was when he issued it.
I started out with a HH based on what I read on Rock's site and WB.
I think it is a good starter hammock, but the more that I hang the more I found its limitations. I think someone else said it...
Added bold text to quote.
If this is true than it seems that most of us using ridgelines are not using his patiented ridgeline anyways. It also seems to beg the question that someone else...
I have to agree that Tom puts out a good product. It seemed to me that they out numbered all other hammocks I saw at TD by a lot. But I have to agree with slowhike on this.
Minus all of the...