Pads vs UQ

[flailer]

My intention was to start with ccf pad, and quickly-quickly upgrade to UQ.

But along the way I found a better solution for me, and with it I solved 3 problems, and currently see no need for anything else.

- First problem was bottom, back, & shoulder chills (wind & dropping temps)
- Second was properly placement of pad, making it stay in place, & size and shape of said pad (which is 1 reason UQ are so nice)
- Third issue was morning calf cramping / stiffness.

I simply punched a small hole 1/3 way down pad, fed a line through hole, rolled-up end section, and tied knot. It works GREAT, & it really stays with me as I adjust my position. It stays with me better than anything else I have tried under my legs / knees

Plus: a UQ wouldn't give me the leg support I want, nor will it allow me to go to ground when needed.

I'm guessing someone, somewhere, has already done this and is just as pleased as I with this simple but functional solution.

To each their own

thumbnail. Hope you can see it & it makes sense.

[pgustaf249]

I use both.

In 3 seasons a 2/3 UQ and a sit pad for my feet.

When it gets really cold (subzero) I use pads exclusively.

Some mention how pads can be uncomfortable. In my experience this is a function of the hammock. Not all hammock designs work well with pads. Some are awesome with pads. In the end, you will find what works for you.

So tell about about your pad setup in subzero weather.

[spandit]

I cut mine in half and use it to form a T across my shoulder and upper back.

I was thinking of doing the same - do you use anything to keep the two bits in place relative to each other?

[gunner76]

Pads:

Lightweight...TRUE

Bulky....TRUE

Not sure how the r-value relates to and underquilt..DEPENDS ON TEMP RATING YOU ARE GOING FOR...BETTER R VALUE USUALLY MEANS THICKER HEAVIER PAD

UQS:

Heavier...DEPENDS ON TEMP RATING YOU ARE GOING FOR, FULL LENGTH OR 3/4, DOWN OR SYNTHETIC FILL. MY 3 SEASON UQ (20 OZ) IS VERY CLOSE IN WEIGHT TO MY WALLYWOLD BLUE PAD (15 OZ)

Warmer (I suspect)...DEPENDS ON TEMP RATING YOU ARE GOING FOR

Conforms to the body more..TRUE

Less space required as they are very compressible...TRUE

NOT MENTIONED..PADS COST LESS THAN AN UQ. PADS ALSO TEND TO SHIFT MORE IN A HAMMOCK. BEST USED IN A DOUBLE LAYERED HAMMOCK TO REDUCE SHIFTING

I started off using a pad as it was all I could afford. When my budget allowed I invested in UQ's (Down and Synthetic). I find the UQ's to be more comfortable than a pad. Is there anything wrong with using a pad, no. If it works for you, then use it.

[Scooter1812]

$8 pad, good to 30s UQ, $150-200. Pad works wet, UQ not. Pad works on ground as camp sit pad, Uh UQ not. Pad is a personal flotation device, with UQ you drown

Cost effectiveness Pad:UQ no contest.

So basically your sayin I should get the mother in law a thick UQ, on the off chance the canoe tips over

[Fish<><]

poncho liner under quilts, cheap, warm, and easy as hades to make. It was my first real DIY project last year and I completed it in less than an hour. The best way to know what works best for you is to try it yourself.

[Rolloff]

I use CCF cut in half, in a Tee pattern. Not had any trouble keeping it under me in my SL. I do stuff some of my clothes above and beside my hips for a little extra insulation sometimes.

The only difference in colder temps would be substituting a 3/4 or full length section of CCF, or the use of a foot pad inside TQ.