Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Hammock
    Hennesy
    Tarp
    various
    Insulation
    pads, foam
    Posts
    3,882
    Images
    17
    I suspect that there are two classes pf product. If there is a mass merchandising possibility then there is a mass copy possibility and a patent may be justified. If the market is small and specialized one cannot justify the cost of a patent but the incentive generally is not there to copy it. This is particularly true if it takes access to expensive equipment to make it.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Statesville, NC
    Hammock
    DIY Bridge
    Tarp
    Old Man Winter
    Insulation
    Balloons
    Suspension
    Whoopies
    Posts
    437
    I have several patents, and have consulted with some very expensive patent attorneys. I am not going to give legal advice. I do know the difference between a design patent and a method patent. A design patent is relatively easy to get. It is intended to cover the design appearance and unique details of a product (think about the decorative brace on a saxophone between the bell and the body tube). That patent is quite specific to that product type.

    The method patent is supposed to be a unique innovation. A new idea. I have been told that both prior art and obviousness will prevent examiners from granting a method patent. As others have pointed out, you may have a basic new idea, and another entity can incorporate your idea with a wrinkle, obtaining a new patent. That is like person 1 inventing a pencil, and person 2 adding an eraser. Neither can sell a pencil with eraser without infringing on the other patent. However, the litigation can be quite expensive, so wealthy entities can intimidate poor entities.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •