While I have no doubt in Dutch's analysis, my personal expirence is different.
IMO, there is more to the difference in the lay of the BB and the ENO than simply the footbox.(although I'm sure that contributes also.)
The whipping WBG does is very different than a simple channel ala ENO or Claytor.
The Claytor style runs the suspension through the channel and under tension, the stress of suspension is directly applied to the hammock body.
WBG uses a channel but the suspension doesn't use that channel. His suspension attaches in more of a Speer gathered/whipped (read larks head knot) style. The long side have very little tension even under the weight of a person. In a Claytor/ENO, IMO, the long sides have a higher amount of tension
Again IMO, based on my own DIY failures, this makes a difference on the lay of the hammock. Add this to the footbox (like I said, the footbox is a part of the equation) and you change not only the lay of the hammock, but the positioning of the person.
No matter what, it sure is **** comfortabe!!
Bookmarks