Gallery Video Directory Hammock Articles Donate Hammock Forums Store Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 Hammock Forums - Elevate Your Perspective How to get more width for a tarp....
 Home Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 10-01-2007, 14:41 #21 GrizzlyAdams     Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Illinois Hammock: DIY Bridge, v0.n, where n is large Tarp: depends on season Insulation: DIY UQ View my gallery 564 Posts: 4,684 Images: 564 passport problems Sister Mary Augustine says that if the hex truly has 8' parallel to the ground with a 14' ridgeline, then the width of the side has to be 70/11 feet, which makes the tarp width on the ground closer to 4.95' on one side rather than 4.8'. She thought that was enough to go after you with her ruler, but I pointed out that these days she needs a passport to get back into the USA, and so I think I dissuaded her. But I got to thinking that since not all "covered space" is created equal (your metric of coverage is bird's eye---straight down) what is really wanted here is a utility function that, for a given tarp, ascribes a "coverage" value to every point in the x-y plane. For example, the value could be the fraction of all rays in the positive z dimension with that point as the origin, which intercept the tarp. This is motivated by the idea of rain coming down. But then not all rays are equal in terms of threat, so the rays that are more likely to correspond to rain would be given more weight. Then to get the utility coverage you'd sum the coverage value over all points in the x-y plane. There's a simpler way I'm sure. If any ideas come to me that can be easily conveyed (unlike the babble above) I'll jot 'em down. Grizz
10-01-2007, 15:48   #22
Peter_pan

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: virginia
Hammock: JRB BMBH
Tarp: JRB 11x10 Cat Tarp
Insulation: JRB UQ of season
View my gallery 2
Posts: 2,701
Images: 2
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Take-a-knee What do you guys think of the Gosamer tarp? http://www.gossamergear.com/cgi-bin/...inn-Twinn.html It looks like it might be a bit short for a hammock at 117".

For the shorter hammocks HH BULA size, ENO , Travel pod, Byers and Claytor exped and mosquito it should be fine... taper on the foot end just means a little less side coverage, probably no big deal... little pricy though

Pan
__________________
Ounces to Grams.

www.jacksrbetter.com ... Largest supplier of camping quilts and under quilts...Home of the Original Nest Under Quilt, and Bear Mountain Bridge Hammock. 800 595 0413

 10-01-2007, 15:56 #23 Rapt Senior Member   Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Belleville, ON View my gallery 26 Posts: 665 Images: 26 Yes, I pointed out that the hex was merely close and slightly short on area rather than exact. (To simplify the math as 6.25 is easier to use than 70/11.) I felt safe doing that as I knew it would give me a conservative result. And yes I understand the thinking that not all covered space is equal, the closer and edge is to the ground the less wind penetration. That said, if you assume a fixed angle of rainfall being driven by a wind, this isn't that hard to calculate. I suspect that we'll find the resulting superiority of one shape over another is still basically the same, at least as long as the ridgeline is perpendicular to the wind direction. I haven't yet worked through the ridgeline parallel to the wind direction case but my suspicion is that it'll come out the same as well, since any loss of coverage at one end will be matched by an equivalent gain at the other. Most interesting might be to work out coverage if we assume a given rain angle and a wind that shifts a full 360 degrees. (I'd calculate one side with a perpendicular situation and one with a parallel and then take it off twice as a reasonable estimate.)
10-01-2007, 16:09   #24

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Hammock: DIY Bridge, v0.n, where n is large
Tarp: depends on season
Insulation: DIY UQ
View my gallery 564
Posts: 4,684
Images: 564
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Rapt Yes, I pointed out that the hex was merely close and slightly short on area rather than exact. (To simplify the math as 6.25 is easier to use than 70/11.) I felt safe doing that as I knew it would give me a conservative result. And yes I understand the thinking that not all covered space is equal, the closer and edge is to the ground the less wind penetration. That said, if you assume a fixed angle of rainfall being driven by a wind, this isn't that hard to calculate. I suspect that we'll find the resulting superiority of one shape over another is still basically the same, at least as long as the ridgeline is perpendicular to the wind direction. I haven't yet worked through the ridgeline parallel to the wind direction case but my suspicion is that it'll come out the same as well, since any loss of coverage at one end will be matched by an equivalent gain at the other. Most interesting might be to work out coverage if we assume a given rain angle and a wind that shifts a full 360 degrees. (I'd calculate one side with a perpendicular situation and one with a parallel and then take it off twice as a reasonable estimate.)
Devil's advocate here. If the rain is coming in at the angle normal to the tarp surface, then I think your coverage area is just exactly that---area, which would be the same for the rectangle or hex, right? If the rain comes in at an angle that is not normal to the tarp surface, but is orthogonal to the ridgeline, then the spread of the tarp is going to make a difference, but the only difference will be for points that are very close to the edge. Seems a small effect overall.

I just know there's a way of doing this with rotation matrices (to describe point of view) and matrix-matrix (or maybe matrix-vector) multiplications....this is just computer graphics calculations....but I got real work to do, play time will have to wait

Grizz

 10-01-2007, 18:03 #25 GrizzlyAdams     Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Illinois Hammock: DIY Bridge, v0.n, where n is large Tarp: depends on season Insulation: DIY UQ View my gallery 564 Posts: 4,684 Images: 564 Triangle revisited In thinking about rain pounding on tarps at normal angles and the like, I realized that to get the coverage from rain falling straight down, you just multiply the tarp area by the sin of the angle formed by the side of the tarp, and the vertical. Does not matter what shape the tarp is, so long as the whole side is at that angle. In fact, so long as the rain is coming in orthogonal to the ridgeline, a similar calculation works, but you need to break it up into two parts to account for the two sides of the tarp. But the transformation in both cases is a matter of multiplying the given area by the sin of an angle. This means that the farther out the tarp is staked (given a fixed height pitch), the more coverage you get. Which means that an isosceles triangle whose area is the same as the 14x10 rectangle or hex with same area will have larger coverage. Which led me to wonder why the triangle in your example came up short---and it is because a 10x10 tarp has less area than a 10x14 tarp. Which you knew, the point was to choose among tarps with common 14' ridgelines, not necessarily tarps with common surface area. To complete the thought, given your figures, the length of the tarp from ridge to corner is 10', giving 127 sq ft of coverage. A tarp that large, with that shape---which maximizes coverage of a certain type---accentuate the point that not all coverage is created equal. Grizz Last edited by GrizzlyAdams; 10-01-2007 at 18:10..
10-01-2007, 20:08   #26
TiredFeet
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MD
Hammock: TeeDee Bridge Hammock
Tarp: Customized JRB
Insulation: Down or IX
Suspension: Whoopie Slings
View my gallery 34
Posts: 1,104
Images: 34
Grizz you lost me (which is easy to do ).

But

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GrizzlyAdams .....Does not matter what shape the tarp is, so long as the whole side is at that angle. .... This means that the farther out the tarp is staked (given a fixed height pitch), the more coverage you get. Which means that an isosceles triangle whose area is the same as the 14x10 rectangle or hex with same area will have larger coverage.
If the shape doesn't matter, how does that triangle give larger coverage?

10-01-2007, 23:29   #27

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Hammock: DIY Bridge, v0.n, where n is large
Tarp: depends on season
Insulation: DIY UQ
View my gallery 564
Posts: 4,684
Images: 564
tarp geometry considered

Quote:
 Originally Posted by TiredFeet Grizz you lost me (which is easy to do ). But If the shape doesn't matter, how does that triangle give larger coverage?
With the height pitch fixed (say at 4 ft) and the width pitch (of the furthest point) fixed, then it doesn't matter what the shape is. The whole surface is at the same angle. If that angle was zero (sides hanging flat) then there is no coverage. If that angle was 90 degrees (of course it can't be) then the covered area is just the area of the side, no matter what shape. The same is true whatever that angle is. In geometric terms you'd say that the coverage is the "projection" of the area onto the plane. (Quick, call your mother and thrill her with your big new words ).

Here's another way to look at it. Think of the surface of the tarp as being the assemblage of many many tiny squares. If you can figure out how much coverage you get from one tiny square, then you get the total coverage by adding up the coverages from all the tiny squares because they are the same. So if every tiny square is at the same angle with respect to the ground, and you get the total coverage by adding up the coverages of all the tiny squares, then any way you shuffle those squares around will give you the same answer, provided that each is at the same angle. That's why shape doesn't matter for a fixed pitch.

So why should angle matter? If you imagine looking straight down at a tiny square and imagine how much of the ground is covered from view as a function of the angle, you see nothing is covered when the angle is zero, and as much as possible is covered when the angle is 90 degrees. The closer the angle is to 90, the more is covered.

So coverage is driven by this angle, and for a fixed tarp height pitch the angle is determined by how far out you can pitch the sides of the tarp. Of the three (rectangle, hex, triangle), the farthest pitch is the triangle, so it has the angle closest to 90 degrees, and the largest coverage (as defined above).

here ends the reading of the First Lesson
Grizz

 10-02-2007, 02:46 #28 pure_mahem Senior Member     Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bennington,VT Hammock: Trecklight Double Tarp: JRB 11' x 10' Cat Insulation: U.S. Poncho Liners View my gallery 32 Posts: 479 Images: 32 Man I sold my freaking graphing calculator when I was done with college, this stuff is giving me a headache. I'm gonna go play sodoku it's less complicated!
 10-02-2007, 07:56 #29 Rapt Senior Member   Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Belleville, ON View my gallery 26 Posts: 665 Images: 26 I think this thread needs pictures... oh wait... That'd mean I'm probably the one to make them... Anyways, I think I understand what you're saying Grizz, and if you're saying what I think then I agree... While its possible with matrices, I was thinking more in line with your follow up post. To my mind the fairly simple trig is the way to go. However we can't neglect the effect of the drip line on the leeward side acting to reduce the "covered" area for that half... With winds orthogonal to the ridgeline.... So its not actually the whole area... However its still in the same proportions as the projected areas.
10-02-2007, 15:04   #30

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Hammock: DIY Bridge, v0.n, where n is large
Tarp: depends on season
Insulation: DIY UQ
View my gallery 564
Posts: 4,684
Images: 564
You are warned....

Quote:
 Originally Posted by pure_mahem Man I sold my freaking graphing calculator when I was done with college, this stuff is giving me a headache. I'm gonna go play sodoku it's less complicated!
You are new here, and maybe haven't explored the site well enough to know that this sort of thing does happen. As a reminder, I've attached a screen-dump of the page with the required-by-law alert.

Grizz
Attached Images
 HF-page.jpg (274.0 KB, 26 views)

 Bookmarks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site Topics     Introduce Yourself     Announcements     Feedback and suggestions     Articles Hammock Camping     General Hammock Talk         Long distance travel with a hammock     Suspension Systems, Ridgelines, & Bug Nets     Top Insulation     Bottom Insulation         Pads         Under Quilts     Weather Protection     Do-It-Yourself (DIY)         Fabrics         DIY Stickies Outings     Hangouts, Campouts, and Trip Planning         Northeast         Southeast         Midwest         Southwest         West         All Others     Trip Reports Marketplace     For Sale         Group Buys         Pay it Forward         [SOLD] items no longer available     For Trade         [TRADED] Items no longer available     Want to Buy Hammock Gear - Manufacturers and Services     Reviews     Other Vendors and Services     Arrowhead Equipment (Home of Kick Ass Quilts)     Butt in a Sling Hammock Gear     Clark Jungle Hammocks     Claytor Hammocks     DD Hammocks     Dream Hammock     Dutchware     Eagles Nest Hammocks     Grand Trunk     Hammock Gear     Hennessy Hammocks     2QZQ Hammock Specialties (Hennessy Bugnet Zipper Mods)     Jacks-R-Better     Molly Mac Gear     OES Tarps     Tree to Tree Trail Gear         Speer Hammocks     Trek Light Gear     UGQ Outdoor Equipment     Warbonnet Hammocks     Whoopie Slings     Wilderness Logics

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35.